Drummond, L., McCartney, F., & Poole, A. (2020). A Pratical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland, p ix. Edinburgh: W Green.
Drummond, L., McCartney, F., & Poole, A. (2020). A Practical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland, para 1-01. Edinburgh: W Green.
Guy, S. (2021, October). Access to justice on the market: an empirical case study on the dynamics of crowdfunding judicial reviews, P.L. 2021, Oct, 678-687.
Dowden-Teale, E., & Gage, F. (2018). Bate Wells - Charity and Social Enterprise Update Spring 2018: Crowdfunding Judicial Review.
Drummond, L., McCartney, F., & Poole, A. (2020). A Practical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland, paras 2-066 and 2-068. Edinburgh: W Green.
McCue v Glasgow City Council [2014] CSOH 124; 2014 S.L.T. 891; 2015 S.C.L.R. 186; [2014] 8 WLUK 138; 2014 G.W.D. 26-510 . (2014, August 8).
Drummond, L., McCartney, F., & Poole, A. (2020). A Practical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland, para 4-037. Edinburgh: W Green.
Drummond, L., McCartney, F., & Poole, A. (2020). A Practical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland, para 5-052. Edinburgh: W Green.
Page, A. (2015). Judicial Review Caseload: an Anglo-Scottish Comparison, p 339, Table 1. Jur. Rev. 2015, 4, 337-352.
Page, A. (2015). The Judicial Review Caseload: an Anglo-Scottish Comparison. Jur.Rev.2015, 4, 337-352, at p 347.
Thompson, B. (2015). The Place of Judicial Review in the Administrative Justice System. Jur.Rev.2015, 4, 417-438, p 428.
Page, A. (2015). The Judicial Review Caseload: an Anglo-Scottish Comparison. Jur. Rev. 2015, 4, p p 343 and 345.
R. (on the application of Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5; [2018] A.C. 61; [2017] 2 W.L.R. 583; [2017] 1 All E.R. 593; [2017] N.I. 141; [2017] 1 WLUK 387; [2017] 2 C.M.L.R. 15; [2017] H.R.L.R. 2; ?Times, January 25, 2017; [2017] C.L.Y. 441. (2017, January 24). Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2016-0196-judgment.pdf
R. (on the application of Miller) v Prime Minister; [2019] UKSC 41 [2020] A.C. 373; ?[2019] 3 W.L.R. 589; [2019] 4 All E.R. 299; 2020 S.C. (U.K.S.C.) 1; 2019 S.L.T. 1143; 2019 S.C.L.R. 1028; [2019] 9; WLUK 256 2019 G.W.D. 30-474; Times, October 14, 2019; [2019] C.L.Y. 573. (2019, September 24). Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2019-0192-judgment.pdf
Christian Institute v Lord Advocate. (2016). [2016] UKSC 51 2017 S.C. (U.K.S.C.) 29; 2016 S.L.T. 805; 2016 S.C.L.R. 448; [2016] 7 WLUK 790; [2016] H.R.L.R. 19; [2016] E.L.R. 474; (2016) 19 C.C.L. Rep. 422 2016; G.W.D. 22-401; Times, September 26, 2016; [2016] C.L.Y. 848. Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2015-0216.html
AXA General Insurance Ltd v Lord Advocate, AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate. (2011). [2011] UKSC 46 [2012] 1 A.C. 868; [2011] 3 W.L.R. 871; 2012 S.C. (U.K.S.C.) 122; 2011 S.L.T. 1061; [2011] 10 WLUK 287; [2012] H.R.L.R. 3; [2011] U.K.H.R.R. 1221; (2011) 122 B.M.L.R. 149; (2011) 108(41); L.S.G. 22 Times, October 19, 2011; [2011] C.L.Y. 473. Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2011-0108.html
Walton v Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44; [2013] P.T.S.R. 51; 2013 S.C. (U.K.S.C.) 67; ?2012 S.L.T. 1211; [2012] 10 WLUK 519; [2013] 1 C.M.L.R. 28; [2013] Env. L.R. 16; [2013] J.P.L. 323; 2012 G.W.D. 34-689; [2013] C.L.Y. 3703. (2012). Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2012-0098.html
Mullen, T. (2015). Public Interest Litigation in Scotland. Jur. Rev. 2015, 4, 363-383 at pp 371-372.
Mullen, T. (2015). Public Interest Litigation in Scotland. Jur. Rev. 2015, 4, 363-383 at pp 377-378.
The Christian Institute and others v Lord Advocate, at para 37; [2015] CSIH 64 2016 S.C. 47; 2015 S.L.T. 633; [2015] 9 WLUK 58; 2015 Fam. L.R. 121; 2015 G.W.D. 29-484; [2015] C.L.Y. 3087. (2015, September 3).
Drummond, L., McCartney, F., & Poole, A. (2020). A Practical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland, para 2-04. Edinburgh: W Green.
Drummond, L., McCartney, F., & Poole, A. (2020). A Practical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland, para 2-07. Edinburgh: W Green.
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition, para 16.094. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Scottish Civil Courts Review. (2009). Report of the Scottish Civil Courts Review, Volume 2, recommendations 155 and 159.
The Christian Institute and others v Lord Advocate [2015] CSIH 64, 2015 WL 5037826. (2015, September 3).
West v Secretary of State for Scotland (1992) SC 385. (1992).
Crocket v Tantallon Golf Club 2005 SLT 663. (2005).
Drummond, L., McCartney, F., & Poole, A. (2020). A Practical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland, para 1.07. Edinburgh: W Green.
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition, paras 5-053-5-057. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition . London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Reid, C. (2012). A new sort of duty? The significance of "outcome" duties in the climate change and child poverty acts. Public Law, 2012(4), 749-767.
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition, para 5-075. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
Himsworth, C. (n.d.) Jurisdictional Aspects of Judicial Review in Scots Law. Jur. Rev. 2015, 4, pp 353-362 at p 354.
Eba v Advocate General (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 29 | [2012] 1 A.C. 710 | [2011] 3 W.L.R. 149 | [2011] P.T.S.R. 1095 | [2011] S.T.C. 1705 | 2012 S.C. (U.K.S.C.) 1 | 2011 S.L.T. 768 | [2011] 6 WLUK 522 | [2011] Imm. A.R. 745 | [2011] S.T.I. 1941 | (2011) 108(27) L.S.G. 24 | (2011) 161 N.L.J. 917. (2011). Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2010-0206.html
[1943] 2 All E.R. 560 | [1943] 10 WLUK 5. (1943).
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition, para 7-036 (quoting judges in various previously decided cases).. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Nzolameso v Westminster City Council [2015] UKSC 22 | [2015] 2 All E.R. 942; [2015] P.T.S.R. 549; [2015] 4 WLUK 66; [2015] H.L.R. 22; [2015] B.L.G.R. 215; (2015) 18 C.C.L. Rep. 201. (2015, April 2). Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2014-0275.html
R. (on the application of Greenpeace Ltd) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] EWHC 311 (Admin); [2007] 2 WLUK 394; [2007] Env. L.R. 29; [2007] J.P.L. 1314; [2007] N.P.C. 21 Times, February 20, 2007; [2007] C.L.Y. 57. (2007, February 15).
R (on the application of Moseley) v London Borough of Haringey [2014] UKSC 56; [2014] 1 W.L.R. 3947; [2015] 1 All E.R. 495; [2014] P.T.S.R. 1317; [2014] 10 WLUK 872; [2014] B.L.G.R. 823 | [2015] R.V.R. 93 | Times, November 5, 2014 . (2014, October 29).
R v Liverpool Corp Ex p Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Association [1972] 2 QB 299. (1972).
Attorney General of Hong Kong v Yuen [1983] 2 AC 629. (1983).
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition, paras 12-003 to 12-011 and 12-015. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
R v North and East Devon Health Authority Ex p Coughlan [2001] QB 213. (2001).
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223; [1947] 2 All E.R. 680; (1947) 63 T.L.R. 623; [1947] 11 WLUK 26; (1948) 112 J.P. 55; 45 L.G.R. 635; [1948] L.J.R. 190; (1947) 177 L.T. 641; (1948) 92 S.J. 26. (1948).
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition, para 11-97. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition, para 11-090. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition, para 11-102. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Woolf, H., Jowell, J., Donnelly, C., & Hare, I. (2020). De Smith's Principles of Judicial Review, Second Edition, para 11-081. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
R (on the application of Keyu) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2015] UKSC 69; [2016]; A.C. 1355; [2015] 3 W.L.R. 1665; ?[2016] 4 All E.R. 794; [2015] 11 WLUK 613; [2016] H.R.L.R. 2; 40 B.H.R.C. 228; Times, December 15, 2015 [2016] C.L.Y. 45. (2015, November 25). Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2014-0203.html
R (on the application of Evans) v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21; [2015] A.C. 1787; ?[2015] 2 W.L.R. 813; ?[2015] 4 All E.R. 395; [2015] 3 WLUK 802; [2015] 2 C.M.L.R. 43; [2015] Env. L.R. 34; [2015] F.S.R. 26; [2015] C.L.Y. 43. (2015, March 26). Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2014-0137.html
R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51; [2020] A.C. 869; [2017] 3 W.L.R. 409; [2017] 4 All E.R. 903; [2017] 7 WLUK 601; [2017] 4 Costs L.R. 721; [2018] 1 C.M.L.R. 35; [2017] I.C.R. 1037; [2017] I.R.L.R. 911; [2017] H.R.L.R. 11 . (2017, July 26). Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2015-0233.html
Heaney, B. (2020, August). Complaint to Ombudsman was not an alternative to judicial review Civ. P.B. 2020, 155, 7.
Drummond, L., McCartney, F., & Poole, A. (2020). A Practical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland, para 6-044. Edinburgh: W Green .
Eba v Advocate General for Scotland; [2011] UKSC 29; [2012] 1 A.C. 710?; [2011] 3 W.L.R. 149?; [2011] P.T.S.R. 1095; [2011] S.T.C. 1705; 2012 S.C. (U.K.S.C.) 1?; 2011 S.L.T. 768?; [2011] 6 WLUK 522; [2011] Imm. A.R. 745; [2011] S.T.I. 1941; (2011) 108(27) L.S.G. 24; (2011) 161 N.L.J. 917 [2011] C.L.Y. 3958. (2011, June 22). Retrieved from
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2010-0206-judgment.pdf
